The above Times of Israel report suggests that Ms Gamliel has not been leading by example.
Environmental Protection Minister Gila Gamliel, who announced over the weekend that she had been infected with the coronavirus, was facing calls to resign after confessing that last week she broke a lockdown limit by traveling from her Tel Aviv home to the northern city of Tiberias.
She also reportedly tried to hide the trip from a Health Ministry epidemiological investigation into her infection.
Apparently, there are some extenuating circumstances.
Gamliel spent the Yom Kippur fast, which fell on Monday, at a synagogue in Tiberias, where her father-in-law is the rabbi, Kan reported Monday.
Associates of the minister have said the congregants all wore masks and that Gamliel slept in a local family apartment in the city, parts of which have been declared virus hotspots. They also asserted on Monday that her husband owned the apartment where they stayed in Tiberias and that they were thus allowed to be there under the lockdown regulations.
Health Ministry officials are trying to determine how many other people were in the synagogue at the time and if the number was more than the permitted ten people allowed at indoor prayer services on Yom Kippur under the lockdown.
The Walla new site quoted participants in the Yom Kippur service as saying there had been 35 people in the building, about half its maximum capacity.
Haaretz also covers the story here (behind a paywall). I thought this part was interesting:
Gamliel’s office said Sunday that the report was “another attempt to harm Likud members through lies and pathetic fabrications. The minister is fully cooperating with the epidemiological investigation and assisting the Health Ministry in whatever is required.”
This seems to be a regular feature in Likud’s response to any media criticism. In my opinion, that type of approach sounds awfully like bluster: long on sound, short on substance.
If the media report was “lies and…fabrication” I would expect, from a minister of the government very much in the public eye, some detail. For example, what exactly is a lie? Did she or didn’t she exceed the 1km limit? Did she or didn’t she socialize with her in-laws? Did she or didn’t she claim to be infected by her driver? Did she or didn’t she go to a synagogue over Yom Kippur. (If so, what was the compliance level?) Did she or didn’t she avoid the Health Ministry officials?
In the absence of a full response, the objective observer is going to come to one conclusion. And that is not one favorably disposed towards Gamliel.