The BBC has a problem.
First, check out this report from BBC Watch.
Then, note the following, being part of the BBC’s response to a complaint:
“The BBC would never include what it considered to be anti-Semitic material in its comedy programmes; here the production team and Radio 4 took great care in reviewing the programme’s content to ensure this, especially in the satire concerning actions of Israeli governments past and present. No offence was intended by the jokes and satirical observations in the programme.”
As BBC Watch points out:
The key words in that sentence are obviously “what it considered to be”. As we learned from the BBC Editorial Complaints Unit’s response to complaints about remarks made by Tim Willcox during a broadcast from Paris in January 2015, the BBC does not use the EUMC Working Definition of Antisemitism…
As you can see from the full piece, the issue is that nobody knows what the BBC considers antisemitism (or antisemitic material) to be.
A cynic might argue that the lack of a definition gives the BBC wriggle room, so they can always argue – should they so desire – that a particular item is not antisemitic. On the other hand, perhaps a definition – any definition – would be too restrictive for the BBC.
How many Jews do you think would trust the BBC as judges of whether something is antisemitic?
But the BBC knows better, apparently. And that is because it is blinded by conceit.